ABSTRACT
Objectives: To determine the leading causes for non-adherence to rheumatology consults in a tertiary care hospital. Method(s): Patients who did not show up for their programmed consult were identified using the rheumatology service database, from January 2021 to July 2022, and they were contacted by telephone to determine reasons for their absence. Result(s): During 2021, we identified 2487 patients who did not show for their rheumatology consult. Sixty percent of patients referred that their absence was related to COVID-19 (38% were sick or in contact with a sick relative, and 22% were afraid of getting sick). Meanwhile, 40% mentioned different reasons: 10% have economic problems, and 30% forgot their consult date. On the other hand, during January-July 2022 period, 1529 patients were identified as no shows for their rheumatology consult. Seventy percent of these patients satted that economic problems were the main cause (impossibility to pay for transportation, consultation, requested studies and/or treatment), while 15% said that they forgot about their appointment date, and the other 15% referred to a reason related to the pandemic (mostly, afraid of getting sick with COVID-19). Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 pandemic harmed consult adherence in rheumatology. Initially, this problem was caused by pandemic-related issues, however, reasons for these 'no shows' have changed, being more recently economic troubles the leading cause, which was induced by the pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Background: Due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, an increase in stress, anxiety, and depression has been seen, as well as greater use of substances and a decrease in prenatal care in pregnant women. (1) Women of childbearing age with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) experience greater psychological stress, which can negatively influence behavior. (2) Objectives: This study aims to compare changes in prenatal laboratory and ultrasound tests by trimester, as well as the detection of anxiety and depression in pregnant women with ARDs due to the SARS CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: This study was carried out on pregnant patients with ARDs from the Pregnancy and Rheumatic Diseases clinic of the rheumatology department of the University Hospital 'Dr. José Eleuterio González' during the period from February 2018 to August 2021. Two standardized evaluations of anxiety and depression were carried out using the Inventory of Trait and State Anxiety (IDARE) and the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) respectively in the third trimester of pregnancy. Maternal report of alcohol consumption during any trimester of pregnancy, as well as adherence to routine laboratory studies such as structural ultrasound and gesta-tional diabetes screening, was addressed. Positive COVID-19 nasopharynx PCR results were evaluated during pregnancy beginning in the pandemic period (March 2020). The pre-pandemic recruited group was compared with the pandemic group. The comparison of the groups was carried out using the Chi-Square and Fisher tests. A significant value of p < 0.05 was considered. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS v.25 program. Results: 50 pregnant patients with ARDs were recruited, of which 24 were included in the pre-pandemic group and 26 in the pandemic group. Compared with the pre-pandemic group, pregnant women recruited during the pandemic had a statistically signifcant higher positivity for state anxiety (p=0.023), likewise trait anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation were detected more frequently, but the difference was not statistically signifcant, a higher rate of adherence to laboratory and cabinet studies was found, being signifcant for laboratories performed in the 1st and 2nd trimesters (0.005 and 0.025 respectively). See Table 1. Conclusion: A higher frequency of positivity for state anxiety was demonstrated in pregnant women with ARDs recruited during the pandemic, as well as higher trait anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation, although this increase was not statistically signifcant. On the other hand, concern about the pandemic and health status could positively influence better adherence to screening and routine studies during pregnancy.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: We aimed to describe the fear of COVID-19 scale in women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) from Mexico. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from September to November 2020 at the Pregnancy and Rheumatic Diseases Clinic from the University Hospital Dr. JoseE. Gonzalez in Monterrey, Mexico. Women with ARDs were invited to participate. The Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S) was applied. The instrument consists of seven items, each with a five-point Likert scale of options. The maximum possible total is 35 points, with cutoff point score of 16.5. The validated Spanish FCV-19S version was used. Also, sociodemographic data were collected from the medical charts. Results: A total of 83 women were included: 46 were in childbearing age, 32 were postpartum women, 4 were pregnant and 1 was going through menopause. The most frequent diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis in 41 (49.4%), followed by systemic lupus erythematosus 31 (37.3%), 8 (9.6%) with other diagnosis (Sjogren's syndrome 2, antiphospholipid syndrome 3, and dermatomyositis 2 and psoriatic arthritis 1 patient). The demographic variables are shown in Table 1. The mean level of fear was 18.09 points, which means the fear of COVID-19 screening was highly positive. Regarding the rheumatic diseases group, women in the category of Other diagnoses had a greater mean FCV-19S score (19.0), than patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (17.45) and rheumatoid arthritis (18.8). Also, in the reproductive status classification the postpartum women had the highest mean score (19.68). Only the group of Non diagnostic yet, had a score below the cutoff point. Conclusion: Postpartum women with ARDs had a higher FCV-19S score than women with a different reproductive status. Women with ARDs and especially postpartum women should receive psychological support and be screened for symptoms of depression and anxiety.
ABSTRACT
Background: One of the greatest challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic for rheumatologists concerns the patient's adherence to treatment (1). The impact of poor adherence on the effectiveness of chronic disease treatment is severe in terms of poorer health outcomes and increased health care costs (2). Information regarding covid-19 on adherence behavior in Latin-American is scarce. Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe impact of COVID-19 outbreak on adherence behavior in Latin-American population with rheumatic diseases. Methods: We carried out a descriptive, cross-sectional, self-report study through voluntary telephonic survey, to determine adherence behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, from September 9th, 2020 to November 19th, 2020, for consecutive patients of the outpatient rheumatology clinic in the Hospital Universitario (Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico), which serves a resource limited population that lack access to health insurance, from five neighboring states. A 17-items survey was designed. Baseline demographics that were collected included age, sex, rheumatologic diagnosis, current medications and patient perception of disease control. Patients were asked if they continued follow-up care, last prescribed therapy and reasons. Also, the survey assessed whether patients had any issues with medication supply and where they were obtaining information about covid-19 (could choose as many options as applicable). Transferred to SPSS for analysis for descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 150 patients were called, the survey response rate was 54.6% (n=82), with a mean completion time of 10 minutes. The mean +/-SD age of the participants was 52 +/-15.9 years, and 95% were female. The most common self-reported diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (13.4%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (13.4%) [Table 1]. Patient perception of disease control was primary good 37.8% and regular 35.4%. Patients that continued their follow-up with their rheumatologist (on the clinic face-to-face, electronically or telehealth) or in another clinic were 26.9%, the majority were nonadherent 73%. Persistence to treatment was 82.9%, the main reason to discontinue therapy was lack of prescriptions or medical advice 8.5% and overall 58.5% had trouble finding their medicine. Information regarding covid-19 was mainly obtained by television (health secretary conference) 90.2%, and the least directly from their doctor 4.8%. Conclusion: Patients continue their therapeutic regimen, still many of them have trouble finding their medications, which affects the disease control. Also, despite having a poor disease control (majority between regular and bad) they are not continuing their follow-up care, more objective studies are needed to determine a specific cause. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: Pregnant women represent a high-risk population during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main cause of maternal deaths in Mexico during 2020 was COVID-19 with 191 (21.2%) deaths registered until December 2020. The age group most affected was 30 to 34 years. Women during their third trimester and during puerperium were the most affected. Information regarding pregnant and postpartum women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases remains scarce. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe a COVID-19 case series from a clinic of pregnancy and rheumatic diseases. Methods: We conducted a descriptive, retrospective study in patients from the clinic of pregnancy and rheumatic diseases of the University Hospital “Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez” in Monterrey, Mexico. Pregnant patients with RD and documented COVID-19 between March and November 2020 were included. Demographic and clinical features were obtained. Results are shown in descriptive statistics. Results: From the 18 women with autoimmune rheumatic disease in follow-up during this period, 2 (11.1%) pregnant women, 2 (11.1%) postpartum women, and 1(5.5%) post-miscarriage woman developed COVID-19. The mean age was 28 ± 6.3 years, 3 (60%) had systemic lupus erythematosus, 1 (20%) had rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 (20%) had the antiphospholipid syndrome. Clinical features and treatments are shown in Graphic 1 and Table 1. The most frequent symptoms were fever (80%), cough (60%) and anosmia (60%). Four (80%) had mild symptoms, and 1 (20%) had severe symptoms requiring intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation. Three (60%) referred history of contact with a person who had COVID-19. All the patients were using hydroxychloroquine and prednisone. No patient in our study died. Conclusion: From our population, a total of 27.8% presented COVID-19. Most of our patients had a mild course of SARS-CoV-2 infection consistent with data from the general population. Additionally, none of our patients had risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease or lung disease. Nonetheless, pregnant women remain a vulnerable population. Prevention measures must continue worldwide to avoid additional COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.
ABSTRACT
Background: The pandemic COVID-19 has set a new challenge in adherence to treatment in patients with rheumatic diseases. Prior studies in Latin America had reported adherence of 16.4% on Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and 45.9% in Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE). There is evidence that these patients believe their treatment increases the risk and gravity of COVID-19 and therefore, suspending the treatment could reduce this risk. It has been shown that a Good adherence is associated to a better survival. Objectives: Describe the adherence to DMARDs in patients with Rheumatic diseases during COVID-19. Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional, self-report study conducted in rheumatology outpatient clinic of University Hospital in Monterrey, México. Consecutive patients with RA, SLE, Inflammatory Myopathies and Systemic Sclerosis, were approached during their routine appointments, March 2020 to December 2020 period during COVID-19 pandemic. They were asked how many days of the month they took the DMARD indicated in the previous appointment, with Based on this, adherence was classified into four categories: Good 100-75% (> 21 days), Regular 74-50% (21-15 days), Bad 49-25% (14-8 days) and Null <25% (<7 days). Data was obtained from our internal electronic patient record registry and analyzed with SPSS V.22. RESULTS: Conclusion: Despite what it is believed, patients are not changing therapeutic regimes. The adherence found in this group of patients was good, for the definition used in this study. It should be considered that the self-report method may overestimate adherence, so the data found must be correlated with objective methods in the future.
ABSTRACT
Background: In Mexico, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has totaled almost two million cases and exceeded 150,000 deaths (29/01/2021). Currently, COVID-19 has become the leading cause of death in pregnant women in Mexico. COVID-19 has additionally impacted the psychological health of individuals including women with rheumatic diseases. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) in postpartum women with and without autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive, and comparative study was conducted. The Spanish FCV-19S version was applied by telephone or e-mail. The instrument consists of seven items, each with a five-point Likert scale of options. The participant must choose the options that best represent their perception about the statements presented. The maximum possible total is 35 points. Sociodemographic information was collected from the clinical charts. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine normality of the data. Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Forty-four postpartum women were included (22 from the Pregnancy and Rheumatic Diseases Clinic and 22 from the Obstetrics Department, both groups from the University Hospital Dr. José E. González in Monterrey, México). The mean level of fear found in women with rheumatic disease was 16 (6.6) points versus 14 (4.6) points in the non-rheumatic patients group. No significant difference was found between groups (p=0.65). Regarding the rheumatic diseases group, women in the category of other diagnoses (that included Sjögren's Syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, and dermatomyositis) had a greater mean FCV-19S score (20.2), than patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (17.3) and rheumatoid arthritis (15.4). Conclusion: Women with postpartum rheumatic disease had a higher FCV-19S score than postpartum women without rheumatic diseases, although this difference was not statistically significant.
ABSTRACT
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has directly impacted the psychological and physical health of individuals worldwide, as well as the global economy. Food insecurity rates have risen especially in vulnerable countries like Mexico. Furthermore, social isolation and economic uncertainty have multiplied depression and anxiety disorders. Pregnant and postpartum women are particularly vulnerable to food insecurity, increased stress, depression, and anxiety. Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the perception of food insecurity (FI) and perceived stress in pregnant and postpartum women with rheumatic disease during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted. Patients from to the pregnancy and rheumatic diseases clinic of the University Hospital Dr. José E. González in Northeast Mexico evaluated between August to October 2020 were included. The Spanish validated versions of the Household Food Security Access Scale (HFIAS) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) were applied by telephonic interview. The WHO recommendations were employed to determine the appropriate intake for each food group in a week. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine normality of the data. The Spearman correlation coefficient and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 29 women were included. Six (20.6%) women were found to have moderate or severe degrees of food insecurity. In addition, 12 (40.30%) perceived moderate and severe levels of stress in the PSS-10. No relationship was found between food insecurity and perceived stress (p= 0.059). The food groups that exceeded the recommended weekly frequency were oils and sugars exceeded 3.9 and 2.9 frequencies, respectively. Conclusion: We found that 20.6% women suffered household food insecurity and 40.3% suffered moderate and severe levels of stress. No relationship was found between food insecurity with the HIFAS scale and perceived stress measures with the PSS-10. We found that oils and sugars exceeded more by the double of the recommended frequency per week.